NiveshMultiplierNivesh Multiplier
    Fund Comparison

    Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF vs Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF Aggressive — Which is Better in 2026?

    Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF vs Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF Aggressive: 19.170% vs 16.710% 3Y returns. Compare risk, portfolio overl...

    AI GeneratedReviewed by Shivank RastogiUpdated 5 April 2026 4 min read
    Overlap
    0.00%

    Common portfolio exposure between the two funds.

    Common Stocks
    0

    Shared holdings driving the overlap score.

    Compared Funds
    2

    Head-to-head breakdown of returns, risk, and portfolio positioning.

    Returns Comparison

    Return comparison across the ranked funds using trailing 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y performance.

    Rolling Returns

    Rolling return ranges show how consistently each fund has delivered over time.

    Max Drawdown

    Drawdown highlights the peak-to-trough downside each fund has faced in recent periods.

    Detailed Fund Metrics

    Fund NameAUM (Cr)Exp RatioAlphaSharpe Ratio1Y Ret3Y Ret5Y RetRoll 3YDD 1YRecovery 1Y
    Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF Direct GrowthHybrid • Multi Asset Allocation
    ₹2304.880.090%7.21111.78769.540%19.170%16.910%19.20%11.63%-
    Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF Aggressive Direct GrowthHybrid • Multi Asset Allocation
    ₹145.420.080%2.04361.078111.430%16.710%13.140%16.60%9.10%-

    Introduction: The Battle of the Heavyweights

    In the world of mutual funds, investors often face the challenge of choosing between various options that promise growth and stability. Today, we will compare two prominent funds in the Hybrid -> Multi Asset Allocation category: Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF Direct Growth and Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF Aggressive Direct Growth. Both funds have their unique strengths and weaknesses, making it essential to analyze their performance, risk metrics, and portfolio composition to determine which fund aligns better with your investment goals.

    Performance Breakdown: Returns vs Risk

    Rolling Returns

    When we examine the rolling returns, Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF has demonstrated a solid performance over the past year, with a return of 9.54%. In contrast, Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF has outperformed slightly with a return of 11.43%. Over three years, Nippon India continues to lead with 19.17% compared to Motilal Oswal's 16.71%. This trend continues over five years, where Nippon India shows 16.91% against Motilal Oswal's 13.14%.

    Capital Protection During Market Crashes

    In terms of capital protection, we look at the maximum drawdown during the past year. Nippon India experienced a maximum drawdown of -11.63%, while Motilal Oswal fared slightly better with a drawdown of -9.1%. This indicates that Motilal Oswal has protected capital better during market downturns. Both funds did not report recovery days, suggesting that investors should be cautious during volatile periods.

    Risk-Adjusted Performance

    Analyzing risk-adjusted performance metrics reveals some interesting insights:

    • Sharpe Ratio: Nippon India boasts a Sharpe Ratio of 1.7876, indicating a higher return per unit of risk compared to Motilal Oswal's 1.0781. This suggests that Nippon India is a better performer when adjusted for risk.

    • Sortino Ratio: Nippon India again leads with a Sortino Ratio of 2.9400, compared to Motilal Oswal's 1.8396. This highlights Nippon India's superior downside risk protection.

    • Alpha: Nippon India has an alpha of 7.2111, significantly outperforming Motilal Oswal's 2.0436. This indicates that Nippon India has generated higher excess returns compared to its benchmark.

    Overall, Nippon India appears to be the better compounder on a risk-adjusted basis, providing higher returns while managing risk effectively.

    Portfolio Overlap & Sector Bets

    Top 5 Holdings

    • Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF:

      1. Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Direct-Growth (21.04%)
      2. Nippon India Large Cap Fund Direct-Growth (20.57%)
      3. Nippon India ETF Gold BeES (19.18%)
      4. Nippon India Nifty Smallcap 250 Index Fund Direct-Growth (17.41%)
      5. Nippon India Gilt Fund Direct-Growth (9.04%)
    • Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF:

      1. Motilal Oswal Nifty 500 Index Fund Direct-Growth (51.83%)
      2. Motilal Oswal Nifty 5 Year Benchmark G-Sec ETF - Growth (22.06%)
      3. Motilal Oswal S&P 500 Index Fund Direct-Growth (13.37%)
      4. Motilal Oswal Gold ETF-Growth (12.21%)

    The stark difference in holdings reflects their investment strategies. Nippon India's diversified approach across mid-cap, large-cap, and gold ETFs allows it to capture growth from various sectors. In contrast, Motilal Oswal's heavy allocation to the Nifty 500 Index Fund (51.83%) indicates a more passive strategy focused on broad market exposure, which may limit its potential for higher returns in a bullish market.

    Expense Ratios vs Alpha Generated

    • Nippon India has an expense ratio of 0.090% and generates an alpha of 7.2111.
    • Motilal Oswal has a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.080% but generates a significantly lower alpha of 2.0436.

    This analysis suggests that while both funds have low expense ratios, Nippon India provides a better return on investment relative to its costs, making it a more efficient choice for investors.

    The Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?

    In conclusion, the choice between Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF Direct Growth and Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF Aggressive Direct Growth ultimately depends on your investment profile:

    • Aggressive Investors: If you are an aggressive investor looking for higher returns and willing to accept higher volatility, Nippon India is the better choice due to its superior performance metrics and risk-adjusted returns.

    • Conservative Investors: If you prefer a more conservative approach with a focus on capital preservation during market downturns, Motilal Oswal may be more suitable, given its lower maximum drawdown.

    • Long-term Investors: For long-term investors aiming for growth, Nippon India stands out as the better compounder, offering higher returns and better risk management over time.

    Ultimately, both funds have their merits, but Nippon India appears to be the stronger contender in the current market landscape.

    Optimize Your Specific Portfolio

    Our AI doesn't just rank funds; it analyzes your exact holdings to find overlap, high expenses, and underperformance.

    Our Methodology

    Nivesh Composite Score

    Funds are ranked using a min-max normalised composite score computed across all active funds in the same sub-category. Each metric is scaled 0–100 relative to category peers and then weighted:

    FactorWeightWhy it matters
    5-Year Return30%Long-term compounding ability
    3-Year Return30%Medium-term consistency
    1-Year Return20%Recent momentum
    Sharpe Ratio15%Return generated per unit of risk
    Alpha5%Outperformance vs benchmark

    A fund scoring 85/100 means it ranks in the top 15% of its category across all five dimensions combined.

    Rolling Returns (CAGR)

    We compute point-to-point CAGR from actual daily NAV data rather than relying on declared fund returns. For periods over 1 year, the formula is:

    CAGR = (Latest NAV ÷ Historical NAV)^(1/years) − 1

    NAV values are matched within a ±15-day window to handle weekends and market holidays. Periods covered: 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Maximum Drawdown

    Drawdown measures the worst peak-to-trough fall a fund experienced over a given period. We track:

    • Max Drawdown %: The deepest decline from any previous all-time high within the window
    • Recovery Days: How many calendar days the fund took to climb back to its pre-drawdown peak (null = still recovering)

    We compute drawdowns over 1-year and 3-year windows from daily NAV data.

    Annualised Volatility

    Volatility is calculated as the standard deviation of daily logarithmic returns, annualised by multiplying by √252 (trading days per year). A fund with 18% annualised volatility means a ₹1,00,000 investment could swing by roughly ±₹18,000 in a typical year.

    Data Sources

    All NAV data is sourced from AMFI India. Performance metrics, holdings, and AUM figures come from fund house disclosures and are refreshed daily. Expense ratios, Sharpe ratios, Sortino ratios, and Alpha are sourced from standardised SEBI-mandated fund factsheets.

    Related Reads

    Compared Funds

    Fund 1
    Very High Risk

    Nippon India Multi Asset Omni FoF Direct Growth

    Alpha7.21
    Sortino2.94
    Roll 3Y19.20%
    DD 1Y11.63%
    Top Holdings
    Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Direct- Growth21.04%
    Nippon India Large Cap Fund Direct-Growth20.57%
    Nippon India ETF Gold BeES19.18%
    Overlap Snapshot
    Shared portfolio0.00%
    Common stocks0
    ₹2304.88 CrExp: 0.090%
    Fund 2
    Very High Risk

    Motilal Oswal Asset Allocation Passive FoF Aggressive Direct Growth

    Alpha2.04
    Sortino1.84
    Roll 3Y16.60%
    DD 1Y9.10%
    Top Holdings
    Motilal Oswal Nifty 500 Index Fund Direct - Growth51.83%
    Motilal Oswal Nifty 5 year Benchmark G-Sec ETF - Growth22.06%
    Motilal Oswal S&P 500 Index Fund Direct - Growth13.37%
    Overlap Snapshot
    Shared portfolio0.00%
    Common stocks0
    ₹145.42 CrExp: 0.080%