NiveshMultiplierNivesh Multiplier
    Fund Comparison

    Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund vs Edelweiss Mid Cap — Which is Better in 2026?

    Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund vs Edelweiss Mid Cap: 23.960% vs 23.880% 3Y returns. Compare risk, portfolio overlap & expense ratios side-by-side.

    AI GeneratedReviewed by Shivank RastogiUpdated 5 April 2026 3 min read
    Overlap
    45.11%

    Common portfolio exposure between the two funds.

    Common Stocks
    43

    Shared holdings driving the overlap score.

    Compared Funds
    2

    Head-to-head breakdown of returns, risk, and portfolio positioning.

    Returns Comparison

    Return comparison across the ranked funds using trailing 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y performance.

    Rolling Returns

    Rolling return ranges show how consistently each fund has delivered over time.

    Max Drawdown

    Drawdown highlights the peak-to-trough downside each fund has faced in recent periods.

    Portfolio Overlap

    Portfolio overlap shows which shared holdings contribute most to similarity between the compared funds.

    Common Holdings

    CompanyContribution
    The Federal Bank Ltd.2.33%
    Fortis Healthcare Ltd.2.27%
    AU Small Finance Bank Ltd.1.90%
    Indian Bank1.80%
    BSE Ltd.1.73%
    Ashok Leyland Ltd.1.71%
    Max Financial Services Ltd.1.68%
    Indus Towers Ltd.1.62%
    Persistent Systems Ltd.1.61%
    Max Healthcare Institute Ltd.1.54%
    APL Apollo Tubes Ltd.1.47%
    Cummins India Ltd.1.45%
    Lupin Ltd.1.34%
    GE Vernova T&D India Ltd1.34%
    Bharat Forge Ltd.1.32%
    Torrent Power Ltd.1.25%
    Sundaram Finance Ltd.1.22%
    Ipca Laboratories Ltd.1.08%
    Bharat Electronics Ltd.1.01%
    Vishal Mega Mart Ltd.0.93%
    HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd.0.89%
    Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd.0.89%
    Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.0.86%
    Prestige Estates Projects Ltd.0.86%
    The Indian Hotels Company Ltd.0.84%
    Schaeffler India Ltd.0.82%
    Jubilant FoodWorks Ltd.0.79%
    Endurance Technologies Ltd.0.79%
    Blue Star Ltd.0.77%
    Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd.0.72%
    Page Industries Ltd.0.70%
    Mankind Pharma Ltd.0.69%
    Radico Khaitan Ltd.0.66%
    Balkrishna Industries Ltd.0.60%
    CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd.0.57%
    Swiggy Ltd.0.47%
    LG Electronics India Ltd.0.47%
    NMDC Ltd.0.42%
    JK Cement Ltd.0.39%
    HDB Financial Services Ltd.0.39%
    Astral Ltd.0.31%
    ITC Hotels Ltd.0.30%
    Supreme Industries Ltd.0.30%

    Detailed Fund Metrics

    Fund NameAUM (Cr)Exp RatioAlphaSharpe Ratio1Y Ret3Y Ret5Y RetRoll 3YDD 1YRecovery 1Y
    Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Direct GrowthEquity • Mid Cap
    ₹43982.510.780%3.50990.96385.520%23.960%20.580%23.94%12.63%-
    Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan GrowthEquity • Mid Cap
    ₹14355.220.490%3.88010.98045.320%23.880%20.250%23.95%12.81%-

    Introduction: The Battle of the Heavyweights

    In the world of mid-cap equity mutual funds, two contenders stand out: the Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth and the Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan Growth. Both funds aim to capitalize on the growth potential of mid-sized companies, but they differ in their strategies, performance metrics, and risk profiles. This blog post will provide a comprehensive comparison to help investors make informed decisions based on their financial goals.

    Performance Breakdown: Returns vs Risk

    Rolling Returns

    When it comes to rolling returns, the Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund has shown a slightly better performance over the past year with a return of 5.52% compared to 5.32% from the Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan. Over three years, both funds performed similarly, with Nippon at 23.96% and Edelweiss at 23.88%. However, the five-year returns indicate that Nippon has a slight edge with 20.58% against Edelweiss's 20.25%.

    Capital Protection During Market Crashes

    In terms of capital protection, the Max Drawdown is a critical metric. Nippon India experienced a maximum drawdown of -12.63%, while Edelweiss faced a slightly higher drawdown of -12.81%. This indicates that Nippon managed to protect capital better during market downturns. Additionally, the recovery days for Nippon were not specified, but Edelweiss took 313 days to recover from its drawdown, suggesting that Nippon may have a more resilient recovery profile.

    Risk-Adjusted Performance

    Analyzing risk-adjusted performance, the Sharpe Ratio for Nippon is 0.9638, while Edelweiss boasts a higher 0.9804. This indicates that Edelweiss provides better returns per unit of risk taken. However, when we look at the Sortino Ratio, which focuses on downside risk, Nippon leads with 1.2211 compared to Edelweiss's 1.1688. In terms of Alpha, Nippon's 3.5099 is slightly lower than Edelweiss's 3.8801, suggesting that Edelweiss has outperformed its benchmark more effectively.

    Summary of Performance Metrics

    • 1-Year Return: Nippon (5.52%) > Edelweiss (5.32%)
    • 3-Year Return: Nippon (23.96%) > Edelweiss (23.88%)
    • 5-Year Return: Nippon (20.58%) > Edelweiss (20.25%)
    • Max Drawdown: Nippon (-12.63%) < Edelweiss (-12.81%)
    • Sharpe Ratio: Nippon (0.9638) < Edelweiss (0.9804)
    • Sortino Ratio: Nippon (1.2211) > Edelweiss (1.1688)
    • Alpha: Nippon (3.5099) < Edelweiss (3.8801)

    Portfolio Overlap & Sector Bets

    Both funds share a significant overlap of 45.11% in their holdings, indicating a common investment strategy. The top sectors for Nippon India are Financial (22.24%), Services (14.14%), and Healthcare (11.18%), while Edelweiss has a heavier allocation in Financial (24.22%), Capital Goods (10.15%), and Services (9.83%).

    The difference in sector allocation can explain some of the performance variances. Nippon's larger stake in healthcare may have provided better growth opportunities, while Edelweiss's focus on financials, particularly in a rising interest rate environment, could have also contributed positively. However, the higher exposure to capital goods in Edelweiss may not have performed as well in the current economic climate compared to Nippon's diversified sector approach.

    The Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?

    For aggressive investors looking for higher returns and willing to take on more risk, Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan Growth may be the better option due to its superior Sharpe Ratio and Alpha. However, for those who prioritize capital protection and downside risk management, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth stands out with its better Sortino Ratio and lower maximum drawdown.

    Conservative investors may lean towards Nippon for its more stable performance during market downturns, while long-term investors could consider either fund, depending on their risk appetite and sector preferences. Ultimately, both funds have their strengths, and the choice should align with individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

    Optimize Your Specific Portfolio

    Our AI doesn't just rank funds; it analyzes your exact holdings to find overlap, high expenses, and underperformance.

    Our Methodology

    Nivesh Composite Score

    Funds are ranked using a min-max normalised composite score computed across all active funds in the same sub-category. Each metric is scaled 0–100 relative to category peers and then weighted:

    FactorWeightWhy it matters
    5-Year Return30%Long-term compounding ability
    3-Year Return30%Medium-term consistency
    1-Year Return20%Recent momentum
    Sharpe Ratio15%Return generated per unit of risk
    Alpha5%Outperformance vs benchmark

    A fund scoring 85/100 means it ranks in the top 15% of its category across all five dimensions combined.

    Rolling Returns (CAGR)

    We compute point-to-point CAGR from actual daily NAV data rather than relying on declared fund returns. For periods over 1 year, the formula is:

    CAGR = (Latest NAV ÷ Historical NAV)^(1/years) − 1

    NAV values are matched within a ±15-day window to handle weekends and market holidays. Periods covered: 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Maximum Drawdown

    Drawdown measures the worst peak-to-trough fall a fund experienced over a given period. We track:

    • Max Drawdown %: The deepest decline from any previous all-time high within the window
    • Recovery Days: How many calendar days the fund took to climb back to its pre-drawdown peak (null = still recovering)

    We compute drawdowns over 1-year and 3-year windows from daily NAV data.

    Annualised Volatility

    Volatility is calculated as the standard deviation of daily logarithmic returns, annualised by multiplying by √252 (trading days per year). A fund with 18% annualised volatility means a ₹1,00,000 investment could swing by roughly ±₹18,000 in a typical year.

    Data Sources

    All NAV data is sourced from AMFI India. Performance metrics, holdings, and AUM figures come from fund house disclosures and are refreshed daily. Expense ratios, Sharpe ratios, Sortino ratios, and Alpha are sourced from standardised SEBI-mandated fund factsheets.

    Related Reads

    Compared Funds

    Fund 1
    Very High Risk

    Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Direct Growth

    Alpha3.51
    Sortino1.22
    Roll 3Y23.94%
    DD 1Y12.63%
    Top Holdings
    BSE Ltd.3.26%
    Fortis Healthcare Ltd.2.90%
    The Federal Bank Ltd.2.80%
    Overlap Snapshot
    Shared portfolio45.11%
    Common stocks43
    ₹43982.51 CrExp: 0.780%
    Fund 2
    Very High Risk

    Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan Growth

    Alpha3.88
    Sortino1.17
    Roll 3Y23.95%
    DD 1Y12.81%
    Top Holdings
    Marico Ltd.2.43%
    Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd.2.34%
    The Federal Bank Ltd.2.33%
    Overlap Snapshot
    Shared portfolio45.11%
    Common stocks43
    ₹14355.22 CrExp: 0.490%